Sunday, June 8, 2014
The Fault in Our Stars
The movie seems to point towards this question of life and romance. With life and romance, you also have death: death of our physical existence and death of love. Just like how our bodies fail us sometimes, so do our relationships. Intertwining these two things, life and romance, is the concept of time and ultimately, oblivion. How long will we live? How long will this relationship last? It's also interesting how the movie returns intermittently to this concept of oblivion, portraying it as a possible outcome to the end of our physical existence, and subsequently, our love relationships.
There are three definitions of oblivion that I find relevant:
1. the state of being unaware or unconscious of what is happening
2. the state of being forgotten, especially by the public
3. extinction
The second definition is the predominant definition the movie refers back to. The male protagonist, Gus, mentions that his greatest fear is being forgotten, to live his life without leaving behind a legacy. Like many others, his ideal self is a hero, a survivor of cancer who lives on bringing hope to the world. The female protagonist, Hazel, views oblivion as unavoidable. Just like how our physical existence for only a short moment, our legacies, no matter how great, will all perish and be forgotten over time. And, with this fear, comes an underlying fear that we will be forgotten by those whom we love.
However, it's the other two definitions that I find interesting. The third could be interchanged with the second because we could ask the question: "What is extinction?" You may define it scientifically, or maybe as "dying out" or "disappearance." But, when it comes to humans, what does the term "extinction" refer to? I think, for a person to become truly extinct, not only must he or she physically cease to exist, but he or she must also cease to exist in the memories of those who remain, or the second definition.
What about the first definition? How can we relate this to the film, or even more broadly to life and romance? It's not a coincidence that the the author chooses to use cancer as an important motif. Actually, motif might be an understatement as cancer is what ironically brings and holds everything together. It is out Hazel meets Gus, and how these two come to terms with the questions and obstacles they face throughout the movie. In one way, you can view cancer as the male antagonist, but in others, it's the glue that holds the story together. But, how does cancer work? How did it afflict both protagonists? The answer is simple; cancer latched on to them long before they were aware or conscious of its presence. As a result, by the time it went diagnosed, it had already done significant damage to their bodies. In fact, cancer is often referred to as a silent killer. This is where the first definition comes in. When our bodies are afflicted with an illness like cancer, we find ourselves becoming strangers to our own body, unaware of what's taking place within us and how much more our bodies can take or how much longer we can last.
So, how does the movie address this issue of oblivion? How do the protagonists address this fear?
It's ironic, but it's the hopeful Gus that falls apart in the end, and the pessimistic Hazel that provides the answer to the question (whether the answer is sufficient, that's up to you to decide). While Gus copes with the realization that his fear might indeed become a reality, Hazel reminds him that he was never going to achieve his dream, but at the same time, she questions that whether or not he is missing something greater. Yes, he won't leave behind this great legacy that he had hoped, but at the same time, no, he will not be forgotten. He won't become completely extinct because he will be remembered by those who loved him.
I wondered if anyone picked up on the significance of Anne Frank in this movie because her story is a perfect example. You can call it an allegory, an analogy or even foreshadowing, but her death, although seemingly insignificant at the time ended up becoming one of the defining moments of the Holocaust. No matter how great the pain and injustice, she found a way to cope with it, and ultimately, her story was not forgotten. I'm not saying the cancer can be compared to the Holocaust, but one cannot forget that this idea of life being unjust was brought up in an intimate conversation between Gus and Hazel that takes place in Amsterdam, and in the end, just like how Anne Frank's story was not forgotten, so was this love story between Hazel and Gus, because we as an audience will remember it (even though it is fictional).
This brings us to the final point I want to make. That is the title of the story: The Fault in Our Stars. Stars is another interesting motif in the story. From the title scene to the ending scene, the movie starts and ends with Hazel looking at the stars (actually the story is told almost like a flashback, through the eyes of Hazel). But, what does the title mean? It seems as though stars is referring to fate, or at least the most obvious conclusion for me is that. However, I hate to think that the answer is that simple. After all, stars also come up again during their romantic dinner at a fancy restaurant, as they have their first sips of champagne, where the waiter says, "Do you know what Dom Perignon said after inventing champagne?... He called out to his fellow monks, 'Come quickly: I am tasting the stars'." And later, when Gus mentions how they will need more champagne, the waiter responds, "We have bottled all the stars this evening, my young friends." At this moment, everything seems to be going well. I would say that this is probably the high point in their relationship, and it is almost as if, all the stars are in their reach. Cancer, death, and oblivion all were forgotten in this single moment where the only thing that matters is each other's presence.
However, in a twisted turn of events, everything goes south. It starts with their horrible meeting with Peter Van Houten, who both Gus and Hazel had idolized, but who also becomes the drunk, cynical, sarcastic and arguable heartless author who seems to care little about the feelings of others. It was this author that also stated something that goes along the lines of, "Pain...it demands to be felt." And, I believe, shortly following this scene, we see the meaning behind this statement. After all, no matter how joyous their time in Amsterdam was, Hazel and Gus have to face the reality that both of them are suffering from cancer, and that Gus may only have a short time left before he has to face his fear of oblivion. And in those moments, we see just how excruciating pain can be, from Gus's breakdown to Hazel's grief. But, it's interesting how Hazel returns back to the simple message found hanging on the wall at Gus's home, "Without pain, we wouldn't know joy." The movie downplays these words as typical comforting words, but I wonder, with Hazel, referring back to them during her eulogy for Gus if these words actually meant more to both Gus and her. Although she felt the greatest pain of her life when she lost Gus, it is also true that through loving him, she gained an unforgettable joy and cherished memories.
I think Hazel's father summarizes everything well when he says, "It was sure a privilege to love him, huh?" How often to we view love as a privilege, especially in the face of great tragedy. But, I believe that the story leads to this exact conclusion. This isn't a sad story, or a classic Shakespeare tragedy, but rather, it's a memoir. It's a love story that emphasizes the moment. While there may have been fault in their stars, for the moment they were together, all the stars were within their reach.
I know that my thoughts are disorganized, but I wanted to write down whatever I could while the film was still fresh in my mind. I will considering edit this when I have more time to organize my thoughts together. In the end, this movie really surprised me, and I would actually recommend this movie to people of all ages, not just to teenage girls.
Sunday, August 14, 2011
A long awaited update...Day 1: Sushi, Storms, and Pokemon?
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Music Ramblings

By My Side (Track Listing)
1. Better You
2. By My Side
3. That Girl
4. You Can Win
5. Uneasy
6. A Dream
7. This is a Way
8. Amy Ave
9. Heaven’s Ease
10. Deserve to Be
11. So Weightless
12. What Do You Know
Monday, May 17, 2010
Rain's Symphony


"Ever wonder why we find rain relaxing or beautiful? Perhaps it is because rain brings life. To the fields, crops and land. It brings back the green, keeps it going so to speak. Maybe it is entwined within our genetics to know this, to bring a sense of peace, that everything will be ok. That the food will grow and that will help us survive. This is surely what our ancestors thought and knew, so it surely is within us."
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Spring Rain!
Friday, January 8, 2010
Avatar (2009) & The Island (2005)
Recently I watched two sci-fi movies, Avatar and The Island. I enjoyed both movies, but Avatar was definitely the better of the two. However, for both movies, the plot really hit on some very important scenes. They both questioned me and made me think about the world in general. One made me reexamine the importance of our world and its cultures, and both made me reexamine our humanity.
The Island, a 2005 film directed by Michael Bay starring Ewan McGregor and Scarlett Johansson, is set in the year 2019. Ewan McGregor plays a character named Lincoln Six Echo and Scarlett Johansson plays Jordan Two Delta. Both characters are part of this mini-world created by Dr. Merrick (played by Sean Bean). In this world, hidden from the “real” world, clones of people are manufactured to be the “insurance policy” of the real people in the real world. The client pays to have his clone made so that in case of any medical issue or problem the clone can replace the real person, giving him a fresh new set of organs.
However, in the mini-world, the clones have no idea of what’s happening. They were created to believe that there was some sort of contamination outside of the facility, and that they have to stay inside the facility to remain safe. However, to instill in each of the members a sense of hope, Mr. Merrick imprints in each of the clone’s brains an imaginary utopia known as the “Island.” This island is supposed be the only remaining place on the world untouched by the contamination. Each day people are picked via a supposedly random lottery to go to this imaginary island. However in reality, it just means that they are being sent to the E.R. to be hacked up to deliver the necessary organs to their client as the insurance policy of their client.
Therefore Dr. Merrick is creating this illusionary world in which he becomes the god. He instills, imprints, in the people he creates a false world. As the creator, he gets to do as he pleases with everything in his control. He deceives not only those he creates, but also his clients as he tells them that their clones are void of any emotion when in reality, they have and feel the same emotions humans have and feel. I won’t go into the details of the plot, but from just the setting, many questions came arose in my mind.
Science is truly an awe-inspiring, yet scary field. Are humans truly capable of creating clones? Are we trying to become God by creating life? It truly frightens me when I try to think about what science can do. Even now, with each coming day we are advancing more and more in the field of science. The many diseases that were once life-threatening are now often curable by a shot or pill. As we find ways to improve our health, people are living longer and longer, with the average life expectancy now that doubles that 100 years ago.
One of the lines of the movies that really hit me was the line, “People will do anything to survive. I just want to live.” For the sake of a longer life, will people truly go as far as Dr. Merrick did? Are we trying to be God by extending our lifespan? As an inspiring Doctor, these questions really shook me. Science has the ability to save lives, yet at the same time, it fundamentally challenges religion, a clash that has gone on for centuries.
Another part that really got me thinking was when Dr. Merrick mentioned how without emotion, none of the clones could survive, so therefore it was necessary to give them emotion. He also mentioned how it was to instill fear within the people’s mind by making up the contamination scenario. This keeps the clones from wanting to go outside. Fear holds them back and keeps their curiosity in check. The other import element of Dr. Merrick’s world is the lottery system and the “Island.” The clones believe that the lottery system is truly random and that people are chosen randomly to go to the utopian “Island.” This reward system provides the clones with a sense of hope that allows them to continue on living each day with a purpose.
There are so many parallels that can be made from this movie, but I think I am going to leave it here. I haven’t really sorted out all the questions myself. But, really, despite how the movie was a big flop at the box office, it was actually quite good.
Now, the movie Avatar directed by James Cameron, the famed director of Titanic, the highest-grossing film of all time, was nothing sort of amazing. Despite being released only a few weeks ago, the movie has already become the second highest-grossing film. The 3-D graphics stunned many as Cameron really placed viewers in the middle of his dream world, Pandora. I was completely captivated by the beauty of this untouched world. I loved the intricateness of each of the creatures and the plethora of plants that gave Pandora the feel of a jungle. Both the animals and plants colored Pandora in cool colors that light up even at light from bioluminescence. It was just amazing to be able to take a glimpse of this world and at the same time, due to the 3-D nature of the movie, feel like you were there as well, walking along side the Na’vi, a race of 8-feet tall, blue, cat-like humanoids. The world that Cameron painted seemed almost believable.
Other than the beauty of James Cameron’s Pandora, the plot itself was very will written. Although the beauty of Pandora might have won my eyes, it was the plot of the movie that ultimately won my heart. The movie is set in the year 2154 on Pandora, a lush, Earth-like moon of the planet Polyphemus. The atmosphere itself is toxic to humans so they need to wear oxygen masks. The people are there in part with this corporation headed by Parker Selfridge (Giovanni Ribisi) because of this valuable mineral called unobtanium (I love the name) that the corporation is mining for. The avatar program is an attempt to improve relations with the natives by creating human-Na’vi hybrids called avatars that are controlled by genetically matched human operators. Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), a paraplegic former marine, becomes a last-minute replacement for his murdered identical twin brother, a scientist trained to be an avatar operator. As Jake finds himself on Pandora, he finds himself in a bunch of conflicts.
In my opinion, the conflicts are what make up the plot of the movie. The main conflict Jake finds himself is an inner struggle of where he stands, his identity. Right off from the start, he finds himself pressured by the science program to fill in the shoes his brother left behind. At the same time, being an ex-marine, he finds himself as Colonel Miles Quaritch’s (Stephen Lang) eyes and ears inside the world of the Na’vi (the natives). Therefore, from the beginning he finds himself in the position of a double agent. One side wants to know the secrets of the Na’vi so that they know how to exploit them and get them out so that the unobtanium can be obtained, while the other side wants to establish and understanding and mutual relationship with the Na’vi by understanding their culture. It’s military/power vs. science/nature.
Later, the conflict becomes humans vs. Na’vi, and Jake finds himself really torn. Now that he’s become a member of the Na’vi, he understands much more about their way of life and their unique culture. The deeper he goes and the more he understands, the more painful it becomes for him to continue to help Colonel Quaritch. When he witnesses destruction firsthand when the bulldozers come in and destroy the Na’vi’s sacred Trees of Souls. He finds himself very conflicted, his humanity vs. his avatar. As the story progresses, and as war becomes almost inevitable, Jake has to choose a side, and it is this internal struggle that I believe makes this story stand out.
As the storyline progresses on, loyalties become muddled, a love story across races begins, and the ultimate clash between human and nature is observed. I found that the film was really critical of human nature, and our one-sided relationship with nature. The humans are portrayed as money and power thirsty people willing to destroy the way of life, culture, and home of another species in order for unobtanium. If you replace unobtanium with the various things from nature such as oil, ivory, wood, etc., the story isn’t really much different. In the future, James Cameron’s portrayal could very well be very much true. In terms of power, Colonel Quaritch is a character that embodies the typical power-thirsty leader, willing to use all means to gain victory, just like how mankind can resort to wars, violence, and acts of terrorism for power, land, and money.
Therefore, after watching the movie, not only was I in awe at the amazing 3-D nature of Pandora, the world that James Cameron creates, but also I felt quite conflicted and convicted as well. I began to think back to all I’ve learned in environmental science and all I’ve heard all over about habitat destruction, global warming, and violence. I began to question my own humanity and think about the many times where I committed wrong acts in order to gain some sense of power, whether it be some competition or better performance in school. Although I am happy to admit that I haven’t faced many of these moments, the movie Avatar by James Cameron definitely made me more aware of my nature and of humanity in general. Although I want to believe that we are all good people in heart, there are inevitably those that are corrupted by power and will do anything to achieve more of it.
So, at the conclusion of my analysis, a few more final questions came up.
Who am I? What is my identity? (With what and who do I identify myself with?) What can I do to prevent myself from becoming power-thirsty? Where do I stand when it comes to science, medicine and religion? What are my boundaries?
These questions might sound funny, but they are questions that have seriously boggled me. I don’t know if I will ever know exactly who I am or where I stand, but I would like to at least be able to understand myself better and figure out my boundaries (or the range within which I stand) when it comes to the tough questions over ethics, morality, life, and religion.
Note: I use religion in a broad sense throughout this entry because the problems and questions could apply to all religions, but for me the specific religion is Christianity.
Sunday, December 20, 2009
First Post - The Scenery from the Window
The name from my blog came from a simple song by Yiruma. Yiruma has always been one of my favorite music artists. His compositions and piano pieces are extremely beautiful and touching. They are the means by which I study, relax, and fall asleep. Why this song? I'm not sure. It's a song that I've always liked, but to be honest, I think I picked it because of its name, "Scenery From My Window." Although the song might be just simply describing a person looking out of his or her window, observing the outside world, just like anything else, the name of the song could also be taken in another perspective.